![]() However in the scenario posed, the lay person performing the sonogram carried out the procedure independently and not “incidental to and/or concurrent with the veterinarian.” He would therefore not be exempt from the licensure requirements. If the sonogram were being performed by the veterinarian, it would be permissible for the unlicensed person to have administered the oral sedative upon the direction of the veterinarian. Under Section 6509(7) “aiding or abetting an unlicensed person to perform activities requiring a license” is an act of professional misconduct.Ħ713 Special Provisions states: “An unlicensed person may provide supportive services to a veterinarian, including but not limited to administering oral or topical medications, incidental to and/or concurrent with such veterinarian personally performing a service or procedure, provided such supportive services do not require a knowledge of veterinary science. Administration of a medication is the practice of veterinary medicine and veterinary technology and may only be performed by a person who is licensed in New York State. The lay person who performed the sonogram was not licensed as a veterinary technician and therefore is not legally authorized to practice veterinary technology. In the scenario described, it does not matter that the veterinarian approved and ordered the administration of the oral sedative. Failure to report the conviction could subject a licensee to additional charges of professional misconduct and may be viewed as an aggravating factor that will increase the severity of the penalty imposed by the Board of Regents. However, the conviction must be reported upon re-registration in that section of the re-registration application that asks whether the licensee has been convicted of a crime since the last registration. ![]() The licensee does not have to report the incident at the time of arrest or even at the time of the conviction. The licensee will be subjected to disciplinary action. That is, the fact of the conviction is professional misconduct, regardless of the circumstances or whether it bears any relationship to the licensees professional practice. The law of another jurisdiction and which, if committed within this state, would have constituted a crime under New York State law īeing convicted of a crime, any crime, in New York State is often referred to as a “per se” act of professional misconduct.Be convicted of committing an act constituting a crime under:.Section 6509 of the New York State Education Law states that it is an act of professional misconduct to: This section explains the applicability of the laws, rules and regulations to the specific facts as they pertain to each question on the Continuing Education Quiz for Veterinarians and Veterinary Technicians. Continuing Education Quiz: Discussion Section
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |